<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we not men?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediacology.com/2006/05/28/are-we-not-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediacology.com/2006/05/28/are-we-not-men/</link>
	<description>putting the &#039;eco&#039; into media ecology and open education (and other tangential meditations)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran U.</title>
		<link>http://mediacology.com/2006/05/28/are-we-not-men/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran U.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacology.com/?p=106#comment-793</guid>
		<description>*applauds*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*applauds*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic!</title>
		<link>http://mediacology.com/2006/05/28/are-we-not-men/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 04:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediacology.com/?p=106#comment-790</guid>
		<description>heh.  I&#039;m always fascinated how perspectives of the SAME thing can be so different.

I felt that the movie in, at least in my view...  how do I describe it... oh yeah, right, ahem... Sucked big time.

Before I explain why, I will say what I liked about the movie...
As a big fan of movies, I appreciated the fact that Brett Ratner stepped up to the plate of a tall order.  After former director Brian Singer &#039;jumped ship&#039; from Fox Studios to WB to direct DC Comics very own Return of Superman, I anticipated that the feel of what made the last two X-men films fun, would go with him.  He took what Singer started and brought it in a new direction, but still &#039;played by the rules&#039;.

As a former big fan of comics, especially of X-men comics, I really dug the shear brazen shock of the movie.  Killing characters off completely unexpectedly while introducing new ones at the same time... that&#039;s what made comic books FUN.  Sure the sub-lined political effect is awesome, but seeing both goodguys loose and badguys win sometimes is so much cooler.  Seeing on-screen my favorite characters come to FULL life still gave me chills (The Danger Room, Iceman, Magneto).

Now on to why I hated the movie so much.
The 1st half was amazing; they introduce the Danger room, they bring back characters, they introduce new characters.  Then with such a great set up for a story, they drop the ball with a horrible use of cool characters, horrible climax, and to top it off they throw in so many cheesy pep talks, I was almost embarrassed when the audience was laughing and mocking the movie.  The plot itself, while again, Ballzy, was just retarded.
It&#039;s like a bad pro-wrestling storyline, the writers come up with a plot for the bad guys to give a really cool sounding threat against a hero, but when the bad guys actually do it, it isn&#039;t very cool looking and is actually very weak and detracts all forms of potential threat the bad guys could ever have again.

I think because I was so much of a fan of the comics, I will admit I was a little bit biased.  They changed characters (how hard is it to give Colossus a RUSSIAN ACCENT for crying out loud!?!?), they chose to use/introduce LAME characters (Even though he&#039;s supposed to be Kid Omega, he&#039;s pretty much a character named Quill, one of the  dumbest marvel characters ever...  I mean come on they could have used SO many other cool characters), they turned one of the greatest villains in history into a feeble old man (although the last few seconds before the credits redeemed it SLIGHTLY), and the &#039;hidden&#039; last scene after the credits was the icing on the cheese cake.

I still encourage people to see it, but just know that it is the worst of the three.  For a so called &#039;last stand&#039;, I can&#039;t help but laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh.  I&#8217;m always fascinated how perspectives of the SAME thing can be so different.</p>
<p>I felt that the movie in, at least in my view&#8230;  how do I describe it&#8230; oh yeah, right, ahem&#8230; Sucked big time.</p>
<p>Before I explain why, I will say what I liked about the movie&#8230;<br />
As a big fan of movies, I appreciated the fact that Brett Ratner stepped up to the plate of a tall order.  After former director Brian Singer &#8216;jumped ship&#8217; from Fox Studios to WB to direct DC Comics very own Return of Superman, I anticipated that the feel of what made the last two X-men films fun, would go with him.  He took what Singer started and brought it in a new direction, but still &#8216;played by the rules&#8217;.</p>
<p>As a former big fan of comics, especially of X-men comics, I really dug the shear brazen shock of the movie.  Killing characters off completely unexpectedly while introducing new ones at the same time&#8230; that&#8217;s what made comic books FUN.  Sure the sub-lined political effect is awesome, but seeing both goodguys loose and badguys win sometimes is so much cooler.  Seeing on-screen my favorite characters come to FULL life still gave me chills (The Danger Room, Iceman, Magneto).</p>
<p>Now on to why I hated the movie so much.<br />
The 1st half was amazing; they introduce the Danger room, they bring back characters, they introduce new characters.  Then with such a great set up for a story, they drop the ball with a horrible use of cool characters, horrible climax, and to top it off they throw in so many cheesy pep talks, I was almost embarrassed when the audience was laughing and mocking the movie.  The plot itself, while again, Ballzy, was just retarded.<br />
It&#8217;s like a bad pro-wrestling storyline, the writers come up with a plot for the bad guys to give a really cool sounding threat against a hero, but when the bad guys actually do it, it isn&#8217;t very cool looking and is actually very weak and detracts all forms of potential threat the bad guys could ever have again.</p>
<p>I think because I was so much of a fan of the comics, I will admit I was a little bit biased.  They changed characters (how hard is it to give Colossus a RUSSIAN ACCENT for crying out loud!?!?), they chose to use/introduce LAME characters (Even though he&#8217;s supposed to be Kid Omega, he&#8217;s pretty much a character named Quill, one of the  dumbest marvel characters ever&#8230;  I mean come on they could have used SO many other cool characters), they turned one of the greatest villains in history into a feeble old man (although the last few seconds before the credits redeemed it SLIGHTLY), and the &#8216;hidden&#8217; last scene after the credits was the icing on the cheese cake.</p>
<p>I still encourage people to see it, but just know that it is the worst of the three.  For a so called &#8216;last stand&#8217;, I can&#8217;t help but laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

