Today is Blog Action Day, and the subject is cosmically charged: poverty. For Americans, and other do-gooders the world over, “poverty” tends to be someone else’s problem. There’s lots of compassion and empathy to go around, but often it’s couched in paternalistic terms. The discussion of fixing Africa’s economic troubles, for one, has often focused on charity. True enough, the system of global finance and the legacy of colonialism has much to blame, but at the same time, “Africans” (it’s a big place with different cultures, religions and languages, so the term is problematic to begin with) are clever, smart people. It’s high time we create a space and step aside to support local solutions, while at the same time doing our bit to end the global slave system we call finance.
With that said, I wanted to return to the issue of “other people’s problem.” Due to the recent financial crisis, it appears that Americans are going to join the majority of the world in terms of economic access and privilege. We consume and pollute way too much, so this is a good thing. I’m a fan of Lynne Twist, author of the Soul of Money, who argues that “abundance” is the wrong goal. She says it’s better to be “sufficient.” I find this an aspiration that is in keeping with justice and ecological concerns. Sufficiency suggests we live within our means; that we only consume that which is available in real time. This means that we stop borrowing against the planet’s resource bank by extracting ancient solar energy, and return to using the solar energy that is available to us on a daily basis. This is how our ancestors lived, and this is how the surviving humans of our age will live as well.
But sufficiency is a spiritual issue as well. Are we always aspiring to a better, utopian future rather than being grateful for what we have? This is a core issues for well-being. I once participated in a “prosperity group,” which was a weekly gathering of friends (mostly folks from my yoga class) who wanted to read a “channeled” book, Creating Money, and to do the exercises together (it’s a great book, BTW). I realized rather quickly that most people in the group would never transcend their state of “poverty,” because they were spiritually impoverished. That is, they believed that their lives lacked sufficiency in that moment, and would always be trapped on the treadmill of negative thinking about their present state of being. I read the book closely and discovered something quite useful. It asks readers to imagine what their life would be like if they suddenly received a million dollars (or any large lump sum). Don’t visualize the things you would buy or other material goods, but focus on the feeling. What emotion or sensation wold it be? At the time I was a struggling freelance writer, so my simple goal was that I wanted to be able to write without stress. I deconstructed my desire to find out why I wanted to write in the first place. I realized that it was because it allowed my to connect with a higher, creative force than what I normally experience in daily life, that I liked to solve puzzles and explore ideas, and to lose myself in them. By the end of the exercise I learned something very important: I didn’t need a million dollars to achieve that, all I have to do is to sit down and write. Problem solved. The money would come later.
A final note on context. I’ve become aware of late that everything I believe and say is benefited from my “cultural capital.” That is, I’m the product of an investment of both my family and society in terms of education and cultural privilege. The truth is that everyone operates from the means that are available to them, and the knowledge that it constitutes. I just want to give thanks that I have lived an abundant life and I hope that I can share and spread whatever wisdom this life has afforded me.