Archive for the 'Ecology' Category

Gore or on “clean” coal

Gore: Don’t Count On Magic | Newsweek Future Of Energy | Newsweek.com:

Newsweek: So industry leaders are acting with unwarranted optimism, in order to build more coal plants immediately?

Gore: It’s beginning to resemble something that the auto companies did for years. Every few years they would show the cars of the future that run on hydrogen or whatever. [They say] they’re going to be magical and pollution-free and they put them in the showroom—but then they never build them. We cannot allow an illusion to be the basis of a strategy for human survival.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Heat is on

Frontline has a new explosive documentary, Heat, about global warming. You can watch it online here.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

What use is intellectual property on a dead planet?

If nature evolves based on open source and networked architecture, then it makes sense that our media should do so as well. The following article makes the argument more acute: climate change media should be open for all educational purposes. I couldn’t agree more. (I recommend clicking through and reading the whole article.)

P2P Foundation » Blog Archive » What use is intellectual property on a dead planet?:

Films and television programmes about climate change should be made freely available beyond their initial broadcast, argues Nalaka Gunawardene.

Films and television programmes about climate change should be designated a ‘copyright free zone’.

This was the call made by broadcasters and independent film-makers at an Asian media workshop held in Tokyo last month (October).

For years, broadcasters have dutifully reported on evolving scientific and political aspects of climate change. They have also made or carried excellent documentaries analysing causes of, and solutions to, the problem. But these are often not widely available, because of tight copyright restrictions.

Limited distribution

Most media companies hang on to their products for years, sometimes long after they have recovered their full investment.

Even when film-makers or producers themselves want their creations to circulate beyond broadcasts, company policies get in the way. In large broadcast or film production companies, lawyers and accountants — not journalists or producers — decide how and where content is distributed.

It isn’t just climate-related films that are locked up with copyright restrictions. Every year, hundreds of television programmes or video films — many supported by public, corporate or philanthropic funds — are made on a variety of development and conservation topics.

These are typically aired once, twice or at best a few times and then relegated to a shelf somewhere. A few may be released on DVD or adapted for online use. But the majority goes into archival ‘black holes’, from where they might never emerge again.

Yet most of these films have a long shelf life and could serve multiple secondary uses outside the broadcast industry.

Thanks Peter!

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Disaster media shake out

Preparedness Now, created by the USGS Multi-Hazards Demonstration Project, is an interesting piece of environmental media. It tries to convey the catastrophic consequences of a major earthquake while keeping some distance through a youthful graphic style so as to avoid being too visceral, and therefore too scary to deal with. Before watching it I expected Day After Tomorrow-like graphics too real to imagine, but I think if it were done in that style it would make it “too much like a movie,” and actually lesson its impact. As many media theories have noted, we often use media as containers for that which we can not deal with in our bodies– we run fearful scenarios in film as a way to contain them and make them less material. We deposit life’s risk into these external shells. For example, all those earthquake films of the ’70s ended up as good fodder for Mad Magazine parodies and did little else but entertain.

In keeping with Scott McCloud’s theory of cartooning, the more cartoony you make something, the more you can project yourself into it because the lack of physical detail creates a space for your psyche to enter. The filters used in the video recall those instruction films from grade school that ran through dirty projectors, invoking the necessary innocence of childhood in order to imagine yourself inside the event. In this way, I think this preparedness video is rather brilliant. It really maintains the right balance between threat and personal responsibility. As a kid who grew up in LA, I can appreciate the usefulness of the piece and wish we had something this cool when I was in school.

It would be fair to criticize the video from one perspective, however, which is the manner in which it disassociates humans from nature. In the video’s scenario earthquakes are something that happen to us, and are not described as part of the necessary adjustments that Gaia makes to maintain an equilibrium. In fact, one reading of the video could be the ridiculous point that we built a significant global metropolis in such a dangerous zone. Moreover, the implication is that insurance companies (and hence caitalism) can handle the threat for us. Finally– perhaps this was an unconscious choice of titles– but isn’t “Preparedness Now” a riff on “Apocalypse Now”? Considering that film and mass media are our main reference points for reality, I’m guessing the title is ironically intentional. As such, it might be interesting to loop back and ponder Apocalypse Now! as an allegory for California in the ’70s. Think about it.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

E-wasting away

60 Minutes is on the scene in China’s Guiyu region to document toxic waste from our discarded computers. We like to think of information technology as being clean, but in fact it can be quite toxic. We need to encourage manufactures to do a better job at building toxic-free computers that can be upgraded rather than discarded every six months when a new operating system is developed.

Via HuffPost

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Environmental literacy in America

A fascinating National Education Foundation Report on environmental literacy points out that in 2001, 63% of Americans got the environmental information from TV. I’d be curious to know what the figure is now, but it begs the question, if this is really true, then why isn’t media literacy part of the standard ecoliteracy curriculum?

Read and download the whole report here.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Ecomedia that I can believe in



Circular Painting from Fly on the Wall on Vimeo.

I’m super excited about this new kind of “grafimation” (hmm, I just made that up)– animated graf art. This piece in particular demonstrates a new kind of ecological art paradigm because as a hybrid of human technology and the natural process of eco-insired creativity, we discover insights about our human-nature relations that a static painting could not reveal. The video does something only technology can do (stop-frame animation) to reveal creative patterning by an artistic community of practice to highlight the evolving and ephemeral-like dynamic of human-nature relations (OK, I know.. too many words in a sentence but I’m too tired to rewrite it). Plus it’s just really cool. It was done for the Discovery Channel (South Africa), a media entity I’m less than enthralled with because a lot of their programming is in many ways anti-nature (despite the eco-friendly brand they have built–more on that later if time permits).

Via Wooster.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Another world exists

In case you didn’t see this, I find it a wonderfully inspiring alternative to the Wall St. mess.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

For nature, everyday is 9-11

Tree-911

Via Fondation Nicolas Hulot

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Corporations against the flow

An excellent but scary looking documentary about water, Flow. Can’t wait to see it.

PS And there is this, based on the book, Blue Gold:

Blue Gold: World Water Wars

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Suzuki Speaks

David Suzuki is one of the most inspirational speakers I’ve ever seen. I’m truly in awe of his ability to connect science with culture and the environment. As this trailer for the documentary for his film, Suzuki Speaks, says volumes about his inspiring vision. If you have a chance, see the whole film. You can view all the documentary’s segments here.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Rating global media’s footprint

200809021050

I’d be curious to look more closely at ClimateCount.org’s rating system, but they’re doing and interesting job tracking corporate media’s climate change footprint. In particular I love the above graphic. Notice it’s a boot print, not a sneaker. Click here to see the campaign.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

The big switch

I was not so friendly regarding the We.org “Free Us” ad in a previous post, but I like this one. So in an effort to offer some positive feedback, I’m pleased that Al Gore’s people are showing us an attainable goal that we can visualize: 100% clean energy in ten years for the US economy. The image of the big switch is kinda cool.

You can go to We.org site for more action ideas.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

350 is the magic number

For more info, go here.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Clay Shirky: open source environmentalism

200808291355

From the author of Here Comes Everybody, some inspiring ideas…

A Wiki for the Planet: Clay Shirky on Open Source Environmentalism | Wired Science from Wired.com:

Wired.com: Can you talk about how social applications could help solve environmental problems?

Clay Shirky: There is no larger collective-action problem than the environment. The three biggest lies of the environmental movement is that every little bit helps, you can do your part, and together we can do it. [Compact fluorescent lightbulbs] are nice, but people going down and changing CFLs in a handful of fixtures isn’t going to cut it.

It’s a collective-action problem. The difference between what all the people can do individually and the global consumption of nonrenewable resources is huge. The tension is … what will it take to get people to act in concert? There isn’t any additive solution to the problem. It will be both governmental and social because that’s the scale of the problem.

And this little zinger about Bill McKibben, who wrote The Age of Missing Information. I concur with Shirky about the book, but for slightly different reasons. I found the book problematic because it makes a false dichotomy between nature and media by using the logical fallacy of a straw electronic man. Of course sitting in a room for a weekend and watching nothing but cable is going to be benal compared to the experience of nature. But few people live in a prison cell watching nothing but TV (but thanks to Bush, that is a reality for more and more people). People’s lives are far more complex, and they don’t own a duck pond. (Still, 350.org may be a solution. More later.)

Wired.com: What do you think about organizing efforts like Bill McKibben’s 350.org?

Shirky: I sort of reflexively dislike McKibben. He wrote a book with a section about the value of a duck swimming around a pond and contrasting that with the vast wasteland of television. But he made a whole point of not telling people about where it was. It’s private property. He owns it and he’s able to go there. Any solution that doesn’t work for cities doesn’t work. McKibben’s natural splendor argument is so unfit for the 21st century. That said, I haven’t seen 350. Maybe his thinking has changed.

PS If you haven’t read Here Comes Everybody, you really should. Along with Henry Jenkins’ Convergence Culture, it’s required reading of understanding the emerging media paradigm.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Disempowered ecology?

Does this ad really qualify as ecologically sound thinking? I agree that the folks in power need to shift course, but the assumption here is that only they have the power to change. Unfortunately I found the message rather disempowering because it disregards us as the source of true power.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

Life’s center of gravity

Cosmology Of Gw

Image source



After a five-week odyssey throughout the US, I’m again in my Roman kitchen and back in the blogosphere. Among the many things on my travel agenda was the commencement of a new chapter in my life: the start of a four-year PhD program in Education and Sustainability at Prescott College. This is an exciting adventure into a very cutting-edge interdisciplinary, self-directed program that will no doubt influence what I think and write here.

After reading about American economic woes from afar, I expected to arrive to a Depression-like US, but found things oddly like business as usual, with the exception of astronomical food and gas prices. And I thought Italy was expensive! Yet, it’s clear that catastrophe remains a potential for the car-centered universe.

Among the many things we examined during my program’s initial colloquium is a system’s theory approach to social change. To oversimplify a complex process, one observable pattern during a time of crisis is a watershed point where people can choose to reinsert themselves into a snowballing cycle of social madness, or consciously choose to change their behavior to solve a crisis, i.e. evolve or die. A cursory view of election ads on US television shows that, in rhetoric at least, McCain and Obama are offering these kinds of choices: more of the same, or some kind of limited change. I’m skeptical that Obama represents enough significant transformation to get off the oil treadmill, but judging from McCain’s ads, I’m quite surprised that there are enough Americans out there who believe changing behavior is too dangerous a course to follow. McCain’s more-of-the-same marketing strategy leads him to ridicule the idea of conservation, which makes me think that simple things like properly inflating your tires is ideological heresy because to promote conservation is to acknowledge the limits of growth, which is utterly antithetical to the utopian world of consumerism. An examination of what motivates people to stick to beliefs that are so self-destructive is warranted. I suspect the mentality of an alcoholic in denial is closely analogous. In the vary least, greed and delusion are ancient human tendencies, but the likes of which on this scale have never been encountered before. We can thank corporate media for at least reflecting this, albeit in a very illusory manner that mocks sanity.

After cursory look at the Quad-City area that comprises Prescott Valley in Central Arizona, one can see a quintessential example of denial in the form of a creeping, virus-like oil-dependent development along highway corridors that extend beyond Phoenix. Having spent significant time in Arizona over the past 25 years, I’m still shocked by ravaging car-driven development growing completely out of control. I just find it impossible to understand why suburban track house expansion continues its viral growth in the desert sand without a hint of ecological consciousness. While driving through these megacity corridors, one can only imagine the ghost towns looming on this horizon, for none of these places can be sustained without cheap oil, something we know is a thing of the past. Even the most dim-witted economist should sniff trouble down the line.

I remain convinced that humans are better off living in sustainable designed, densely populated mixed-use urban centers that can thrive on local and pedestrian traffic. Perhaps in its own strange way, Rome has survived and evolved with this model, which may account for its 3000-year longevity (granted it was founded on similar principles that now drive the US economy, but Rome survives, and that should give some level of optimism for the rest of us). As for America, the business-as-usual exburb landscape will be dust sooner than later, and it will be the result of poor human imagination, or at least a lack of creative problem solving that changes from the mental center of gravity of resource-driven empire building as depicted in the cartoon above to something more reasonable on a biological scale. To re-state the obvious, our dysfunctional economic metabolism threatens to out-consume and foul the nest. Economy and ecology both come from the etymological root for home. This is worth considering. Deeply.

I remain encouraged by the forward-thinking people and communities in the US (and world) who are taking the 7th generation longview of a petroleum-less dependent future, a model of which is embodied by the experiment of Arcosanti (ironically in the Quad-City are) and my program at Prescott College. I only hope that it comes sooner than later.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext