Xmas postscript

200801061826
Image source: Apoplectic Press
What follows will surely put me on Bill O’Reilly‘s Most Wanted list (that is if I hit his radar at all, which is totally unlikely), but I came to the conclusion today that the number one cause of global warming has to be…. Christmas. Consider the following:

  • The power consumed for all the Christmas lights;
  • The carbon emissions caused by holiday travel;
  • The net reduction of trees from Christmas tree harvesting;
  • The waste of paper (and hence trees) caused by wrapping;
  • The resources consumed and pollution caused by the production of Christmas gifts;
  • The amount of resources needed to clean-up the environmental impact of Christmas (such as garbage collection);
  • The impact of food production for the holidays on soil, atmosphere and water supply;
  • The environmental resources consumed to make Christmas advertising.

I think if Jesus could peer into the future and see what his birthdate would do to the planet he would surely have called for a moratorium on such celebrations.

Technorati Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Something wicked comes this way

Mickey-Attacks
I am now facing my first fatherhood crisis. No it’s not the fact that I haven’t slept more than four hours in a night in the past seven months, nor the daily grind of spit and poop. No, it came in the form of a three foot mouse named Mickey, an uninvited guest who landed in the dark night of Xmas.

Receiving a monstrous Mickey Mouse doll should be a family decision. This is not something you casually buy someone with no warning. It’s an invasion, the D-Day of consumer capitalism. A well-meaning relative believed he was doing the right think by giving our daughter this play thing, yet it’s one of a dimension that can only be deemed, uhm, American. To a seven-month-old this is not a toy, a mouse or a Disney character, but a large plush blob conglomerating abstract shapes that through training takes the form of something more recognizable in the future. I have no doubt that Mickey will now join the family and give her hours of joy. That’s why I feel guilty re-naming him Beelzebub.

Upon rolling my eyes when He arrived, my Italian partner reminded me that I already have a Ronald McDonald doll in the apartment. But he’s wearing a Mexican wrestler’s mask and a button that says “McShit.” I also pointed out that I have two Zapatista dolls as well. She wondered why I object to the innocent looking creature that takes up half our couch. I responded that he is the smiley face of Empire, a gateway drug to consumerism. Once our daughter becomes acclimated to Mickey’s likeness, then the door opens up to a host of other nefarious consumer goods, none of which I can afford, nor do I want to. But can I break her little heart by arguing that Mickey was probalby made by Chinese prison labor, or that the fire retardant material it’s made out of is comprised of neurotoxins? But alas I remember my grandmother telling me that I should finish my food because other kids in the world were starving. I always hated it when she said that. I don’t think I will impose globalization upon my daughter. Yet.
Now, I don’t intend to censor my daughter’s reality. If she wants Disney, she will have Disney, with restraint, of course. We’ll do Santa, too. I don’t intend to be an anti-capitalst scrooge, 1) because I won’t deny her the magical aspects that brought me happiness as a child, and 2) because it will make her a social outcast. I know too many hippie kids who ended up becoming stock brokers and real estate agents because their parents nursed them on wheat grass and made them toys out of roof shingles. Still, something has to be done. Ultimately I have learned that it’s better to ask questions and let the child decide what is right and wrong. This is how my grandfather approached things, even when he denied me coloring books because they controlled my creativity. I honestly don’t know how I will respond when the society will parent my child again. But rest assured, I’m making it my project to design the best mousetrap possible.
BTW, Happy Holidaze!

Technorati Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Out-slacking the slackers: right on!

Millennial
What happens when this young man rules the world?

Stay Free! Daily:

A Wall Street Journal columnist blames twentysomething narcissism on Mr. Rogers (unfair!), Boomer-style permissive parenting (getting warmer), and the gospel of self-esteem (warmer still). What the press reports seem to miss, however, is the fact that this is the first generation of children raised in an environment of unabashed marketing. In 1980, corporate lobbying managed to get Congress to abolish the Federal Trade Commission’s authority to regulate advertising to kids. With no watchdog in sight, an entire industry developed to market directly to kids. Full-length commercials began masquerading as TV cartoons. Channel One launched its in-school advertising “news” network. And junk food marketing skyrocketed. The most common message of marketing to tweens and teens is this: your parents are idiots, your teachers are dull, you’re so much cooler than everyone else. But we understand you and know what you want. Product!

What may be bad news for the pampered white kids featured in the segment, though, should be good news for America’s immigrants. Based on this segment, I’d say immigrants who’ve brought over a strong work ethic will have a great shot at out-achieving the coddled elites, once employers stop instinctively hiring rich whites. Let’s hear it for class war!

Carrie McLaren from Stay Free! discusses in the above post the recent whining in the media about what crappy workers the next batch of post-grads have become. The so-called “millennials” are even out-slacking the slackers (that would be my generation: “X”– sorry folks, the name is taken). Like Carrie I’ve been irritated by a lot of the complainers who are attacking liberal media or parenting techniques by the so-called “helicopter” parents. Who are these dreaded parents destroying the world with all their love and affection? Last time I checked (and as a former teacher I can tell you that I checked a lot), most families I dealt with were completely broken: divorced, working ten jobs, alcoholic, impoverished, I could go on. This mythic creature of the suburban parent and the overly protective family is some kind of demographic fantasy, or… I may just live on the wrong planet. Both might be true.

I think Carrie nails a few points. One is that advertising does demonize authority, teachers and parents. If you don’t believe me, randomly select any Budweiser ad and tell me I’m wrong. The common concern of the articles she sites is that immigrants still have a strong work ethic and , boo-hoo, the white race will slack off and die. The problem for marketers and the businesses that depend on them is that their realities are imploding. The whole history of sucking the emotion out of workers is the source of “cool” and the current trend of the ironic disposition. No one is allowed to care anymore, because if you do, you might actually unionize (see my previous post on the writer’s strike). Besides, why should we care? Most corporations of yore (the kind that our parents and grandparents grew up working for) at least offered you job security for selling your soul to the company store. Not anymore. They want your undying attention and will farm your pension to some bankrupt Enron of the future so that every dime of your retirement ends up in the golden parachute of the next defrocked CEO of international finance. Geez, with so much hypocrisy looping around our economic system, it’s hard to find a reason why anyone should care about whether or not a 20 year old has enough focus to read a spreadsheet before switching to Tetras. Slack on!

Oh, and add to that the need for a volunteer military who cares enough and will willingly die for abstract concepts like freedom and democracy in the world’s shitholes that happen to be of interest because of their proximity to composted dinosaurs. LOL.

I’d like to add the following theory. Part of the reason our culture (the affluent one that is supposed to perform the knowledge work of our society) is imploding is because they are the last generation to play out the final act of the alphabetized, and hence right-brained, mind. Immigrants, many of whom come from countries that are not dominated by the history of print literacy, have spacial minds that contain broader realities, including the multidimensional, multilayered, pattern-like world that is emerging. Perhaps that is is why they will some day (soon) rule the world. I’m crying crocodile tears.

Technorati Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Media and identity loss

The loss of identity is a Western problem. One argument concerning the multitude is that the growing immigrant and migratory class– including refugees– will have what it takes to survive the global mindfrak, since they are the ones adept at transitioning states of being. Only those attached to a “stable” reality are screwed. While it is true the multinational pop-media-military-fear complex is in the business of producing subjectivities, they are now highly dependent on the user for content. A cynic might argue that the “prosumer” is just a deeper step into the control of our time, because we “work” at all hours producing their content and by giving them our attention. I still feel strongly that deep inside even the most scared and mechanically destroyed consciousness is a sense of authenticity, truth, love, and all that we deem as “good.” The problem for corporations is that their hyper commercialism threatens to cancel their messages out. There is so much brand noise, there isn’t much to be distinguished anymore (except the subjectivity itself which is imploding under the weight of post-irony). I don’t agree with most media critics who believe that we are being brainwashed. That is only true if we continue to believe in the reality bubble of the West that assumes that we inhabit a false reality. Furthermore, we should not fear the media. If we do, they win. But “they” is suspicious. In the end, we are the media.

Bookmark and Share

A 21st century library

Prelinger-1

I’ve been reading Everything is Miscellaneous, which is a great primer on how all the crazy categorization schemes that we see as natural (alphabetic, numeric), are not only contrived, but are falling apart because of information technology. So I was interested to come across this interview with Prelinger Library librarian Nancy Pearl. Rick Prelinger’s collection is at the root of the Internet Archive, a great “resource of human knowledge,” i.e. copyright free images, movies, lectures, software and a bunch of other cool stuff.

Creating the 21st Century Library — In These Times:

How do you think the digitization of books should effect how libraries manage their print collections?

In the library and document preservation worlds, there exists a concern that the growth of the digital environment will result in the end of print, and that books and newspapers need to be rescued from the digital future. I don’t believe that. Books as artifacts will always have value apart from their digital counterparts.

Yes, the online environment obviously offers mass dispersal into the world and that’s not possible in a print library environment. But part of our library project is about collapsing the polarization between print and digital, and looking toward a third way where a library can be a hybrid analog-digital space. Books are both retained and valued, and where a digital collection exists, maybe it allows more freedom with what the analog collection can do, because you can always do a keyword search of the digital collection. Maybe the benefits of one liberate the other.

Bookmark and Share

Random daily thought

Us Soldiers Take Pics

It’s ironic that the industrial military mindset backed by the most advanced technological image generating mechanism in world history finds itself bogged down in the Middle Eastern desert as its effort to control the information, power and military paradigm of the 20th century is literally being ripped apart one cell phone-powered IED at a time by an insurgent, decentralized, human powered cultural force that decries the representation of god in all forms of media. Just an observation.

Bookmark and Share

Brain hemispheric politics

Brain Hem

Study finds left-wing brain, right-wing brain – Los Angeles Times:

“There is ample data from the history of science showing that social and political liberals indeed do tend to support major revolutions in science,” said Sulloway, who has written about the history of science and has studied behavioral differences between conservatives and liberals.

Lead author David Amodio, an assistant professor of psychology at New York University, cautioned that the study looked at a narrow range of human behavior and that it would be a mistake to conclude that one political orientation was better. The tendency of conservatives to block distracting information could be a good thing depending on the situation, he said.

I’m a few days behind on this story, but ironically it’s because I’m working on my book which deals a little with the left and right brain hemispheres as being instruments for processing different kinds of media. McLuhan and Powers in The Global Village break the different brain hemispheres down as follows:

Eye-Left Hemisphere
Visual-Speech-Verbal

Logical, Mathematical
linear, Detailed
Sequential
Controlled
Intellectual
Dominant
Quantitative
Active
Analytic
Reading, Writing, Naming
Sequential Ordering
Perception of Significant Order
Complex Motor Sequences

Ear-Right Hemisphere
Tactile-Spatial-Musical-Acoustic

Holistic
Artistic, Symbolic
Simultaneous
Emotional
Intuitive, Creative
Minor, Quiet
Qualitative
Receptive
Synthetic, Gestalt
Facial Recognition
Simultaneous Comprehension
Perception of Abstract Patterns
Recognition of Complex Figures

(McLuhan, Powers, p. 54)

Based on these differing functions I’d guess the left brain is probably the Republican side. (BTW, the left-brain controls the right side of the body, so you could say that it is the “right wing” of the body.)

Bookmark and Share